Danforth, Eunice & Griselda

Tonight, I read "D for Danforth," "E for Eunice," and "G for Griselda," my favorite of the three being "G for Griselda." This essay, compared to the other two, clearly addresses its claim in its introduction paragraph. The writer sets up a straight-forward explanation as to what will be argued and revealed throughout the essay without being too repetitive or vague. He or she clearly explains that Greene and Austen differ, in that, Greene "allows the reader to grasp their (*should be his or her*) own opinions about each character" and Austen hints the nature of each one of her characters to her reader. The writer, however, tends to get a bit off topic throughout the course of her essay and makes some random claims for her analysis without any explanations. As stated by Princeton's Kerry Walk, a "B range" paper includes a thesis, evidence, analysis, and structure as contributions of an essay which are said, but not fully developed.